Michael Meehan

The soft commercial market has slowed growth in risk retention groups, but they remain poised to operate more efficiently and take advantage of a hardening—if and when it happens. Michael Meehan of Milliman explains

How did RRGs perform in 2016?

From what I have been seeing, risk retention groups (RRGs) experienced modest premium growth of approximately 2 percent during 2016. This was certainly lower than the near 7 percent growth in 2015 and more than 10 percent growth in 2014. The growth the industry experienced in the middle part of this decade has clearly slowed. I think this is largely influenced by the soft commercial market, particularly as it relates to the liability coverages that would often be good candidates to be insured through RRGs.

The rate increases in these lines of business have been modest at best over the past several years, which may be part of the reason that few new RRGs have formed over that time period. However, I would say the industry remains strong as the number of RRGs in operation has remained pretty stable. To me, this suggests that RRGs that have already formed are not being influenced by changes in the commercial market and may view the RRG as their long term risk financing solution as opposed to a stop gap or bridge solution during a harder commercial market.

Has this picture changed in 2017?

It is still relatively early in the year, which makes it challenging to draw any sort of definitive conclusions with regards to performance in current year. However based on the limited Q1 information that I have seen, the results are very similar to what the RRG industry experienced during 2016, with loss and loss expense ratios of approximately 80 percent.

Do RRGs remain adequately capitalised?

RRGs, while considered a type of captive insurance company, are really sort of a hybrid between a captive and a more traditional mutual insurance company. As such, they are required to complete an annual statutory filing, often referred to as ‘the yellow book’, which provides the regulator with a substantial amount of financial information about the RRG. For example, as part of the required statutory filing, RRGs are required to calculate their risk-based capital, which is a financial metric developed and used by regulators to evaluate the minimum capital that is needed by a company to support its overall operations and risk.

In addition, RRGs are also required to calculate a series of financial metrics known as Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS) Ratios that regulators, as well as actuaries and auditors, will also review when evaluating the financial strength of RRGs. Therefore, in general, I would say that RRGs are typically capitalised pretty well as regulators have the means to identify pretty quickly those that are not. The regulator can then work with the RRG to develop an action plan to get them back to a stronger financial position.

In reviewing some RRG industry information, specifically aggregated premium, loss reserve, and surplus data, I would say that over the past five years or so, there has been a bit of reduction in the overall level of surplus for RRGs relative to their net written premiums, and reserve amounts. While the numbers do vary quite a bit by RRG, the combined numbers are still indicate that the industry as a whole is financially strong.

What can RRGs do in terms of risk management to bring down their costs?

RRGs could consider using predictive analytics to help them control their costs. As an industry, we have become much better with gathering and maintaining claims information.

This, coupled with the increased computing power available to us, presents companies with significant opportunities for potentially reducing their costs. For example, using predictive analytics, companies are mining their claims information to help identify triggers or common traits that can often be indicative of a potentially costly claim. This enables the company to dedicate its best resources to the more complex claims sooner, which can lead to lower claims costs. Advances in technology are providing companies with significant cost saving opportunities and that trend is likely to continue.

What are some of your predictions for the financial performance of RRGs for the rest of 2017?

I hesitate to make too many predictions because there are a number of factors that could have a significant impact on the industry. For example, a precedent setting legal decision could have a material impact on the cost of claims and thus, on the financial performance of RRGs. However, as I stated earlier, rate level changes in the commercial market have been modest over the past few years.

Through the first few months of 2017, we have been seeing these rate level changes starting to rise, albeit slightly, in the liability lines. If this trend continues, and the commercial market begins to harden, the potential is there for there to be some modest growth in the risk retention market, either through existing groups adding new members, or possibly through the creation of new RRGs.

The latest interviews from Captive Insurance Times
The latest features from Captive Insurance Times
Jeremy Colombik of MSI and NCCIA chair explains to Becky Butcher that Notice 2016-66 could be detrimental to not just North Carolina, but other domiciles that are home to smaller captives
Dan Towle, president of CICA and Zach Finn, professor at Butler University, discuss their new professional development partnership, which will see students learn about the variety of career opportunities in captive insurance
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Alan Cabello of AGCS discusses blockchain technology, captives and the future
Alan Fine of Brown Smith Wallace explains how the industry should proceed after the Avrahami court case ruling
Dana Hentges Sheridan, general counsel and chief compliance officer at Active Captive Management, provides insight into the differences between business risks and insurance risks
Predicting when interest rates will change is difficult, which is even more reason to maintain a disciplined approach to your investments, according to Stephen Nedwicki of Comerica Bank
Looking ahead to 2018, Phillip Giles of QBE North America predicts continued uncertainty for the healthcare reform
Michael Schroeder of Roundstone explains why transparency, control and cost savings are the secret sauce offered by a medical captive
Domicile profiles
The latest domicile profiles from Captive Insurance Times
Tennessee’s governor, commissioner, general assembly and business community have all worked together to create ‘explosive growth’ in the state’s captive insurance industry. Julie Mix McPeak explains more
Newly-appointed chairman of CCIA Michael Maglaras suggests that the future is bright for state’s captive industry
Asset Servicing Times

Visit our sister site
for all the latest asset servicing news and analysis

Although the Isle of Man is currently focusing on updating its regulatory framework, Solvency II, Brexit and the Asian market all hold big opportunities for the island
Debbie Walker of the North Carolina Department of Insurance tells Becky Butcher why the state is among 2017’s standout performers
Experts convene to talk to Becky Butcher about the stability that Guernsey represents in a challenging financial and political environment
In an era of increasing uncertainty, Tamatoa Jonassen suggests that the Cook Islands can be a bridge to financial security in a captive
With a dedicated captive plan in place, the Lone Star State is on the rise, says Josh Magden of the Texas Captive Insurance Association
After 36 years of captive business, Vermont boasts a culture of legislative change, and still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Dan Towle and David Provost explain