Mike Stalley

Although the Panama Papers brought focus to the appropriate use of a captive, Mike Stalley of FiscalReps suggests the leak could benefit the industry

Since the release of the Panama Papers, has the scrutiny of captives increased internally, externally, or both?

The awareness of the use of complex offshore financial structures in general has certainly increased, although not necessarily direct scrutiny of captives.

With greater transparency demanded by many stakeholders, and with increased scrutiny from the media, it’s probably inevitable that the appropriate use of captives, as part of an overall risk management strategy, will be considered by multinational corporations that wish to be more transparent in their operations and structure.

Conversely, the additional scrutiny could benefit the captive industry as it presents an opportunity to sell the use of a captive structure as a transparent, non-aggressive risk transfer mechanism.

The majority of captives are formed for risk management reasons, rather than for tax purposes, so providers of captive solutions can demonstrate the value of captives to the wider business world.

What concerns, if any, have the Panama Papers raised among your clients?

Most public companies that own captives are already required to make significant disclosures about all their holdings, this is so the ability to ‘hide’ assets offshore is already significantly reduced.

What bearing does this leak have on captives’ tax planning? What are you recommending?

These leaks have certainly brought the subject of aggressive tax planning more into the spotlight. At FiscalReps, we do not promote aggressive tax planning, we focus on achieving and maintaining tax compliance for clients. Tax is a consequence of doing business—it should always be considered in any commercial arrangements, but making arrangements primarily for tax reasons is, in my opinion, never a wise approach.

Interestingly, topics such as base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) regulation and increasing activity from many tax authorities are already focusing the minds of many multinational organisations on tax compliance. The release of the Panama Papers is really another push in that direction.

From a transfer pricing perspective, the simplest argument for a tax authority to assert is that the premium being charged by the captive to its insured party is not at arm’s length, by reference to premiums paid for similar risks in the open market.

That, in essence, is the transfer pricing argument—is the premium being charged artificially inflated or deflated, either in order to shift profits to a lower tax jurisdiction or to shift costs to a higher tax jurisdiction?

In my opinion, the strongest defence is for a captive to demonstrate that the risks it is insuring are non-typical by their nature, with equivalent coverages unavailable in the open market.

Placing a vanilla property damage, business interruption or general liability policy through the captive may not meet that test adequately.

Secondly, designing a risk transfer programme that encourages the right risk behaviours from participating insureds, with an insurance policy being an element of the wider programme, will create a contract of insurance that is not comparable with those available on the open market.

The greater the differential between the bespoke captive insurance policy and the equivalent vanilla open market policy, the easier it is to demonstrate that the captive premium is fair for the risk being insured, and not artificially set based on equivalent open market coverages.

We have a number of clients who are very creative in their use of captives and the insurance coverages they write, with the key benefits being better risk management, lower costs to the business, and the alignment of corporate behaviours across the business.

Looking to the future, how will corporates weigh their reputations and contentious tax issues?

The reputational value of a business is very hard to assess, but it’s easy to lose quickly with the wrong headline regarding a corporate’s tax affairs.

Within our client base we have seen a real desire to become fully compliant and transparent when it comes to taxes—a drive to be that good corporate citizen and pay the right amounts of tax to the right tax authorities.

Making decisions and implementing aggressive tax planning strategies, I believe, will be subject to increasing internal scrutiny before final decisions are made, with the need to manage reputational risk being one of the key factors to consider.

The latest interviews from Captive Insurance Times
The latest features from Captive Insurance Times
Jeremy Colombik of MSI and NCCIA chair explains to Becky Butcher that Notice 2016-66 could be detrimental to not just North Carolina, but other domiciles that are home to smaller captives
Alan Fine of Brown Smith Wallace explains how the industry should proceed after the Avrahami court case ruling
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Dana Hentges Sheridan, general counsel and chief compliance officer at Active Captive Management, provides insight into the differences between business risks and insurance risks
Predicting when interest rates will change is difficult, which is even more reason to maintain a disciplined approach to your investments, according to Stephen Nedwicki of Comerica Bank
Looking ahead to 2018, Phillip Giles of QBE North America predicts continued uncertainty for the healthcare reform
Michael Schroeder of Roundstone explains why transparency, control and cost savings are the secret sauce offered by a medical captive
Attendees of the Guernsey Insurance Forum heard how important it is for different parts of the industry to work together not only to co-exist, but also to collaborate
Captives must demonstrate they are both efficient and cost effective. Colin Freeman and Peter Downey explain what Barclays can do to help
Domicile profiles
The latest domicile profiles from Captive Insurance Times
Tennessee’s governor, commissioner, general assembly and business community have all worked together to create ‘explosive growth’ in the state’s captive insurance industry. Julie Mix McPeak explains more
Newly-appointed chairman of CCIA Michael Maglaras suggests that the future is bright for state’s captive industry
Asset Servicing Times

Visit our sister site
for all the latest asset servicing news and analysis

Although the Isle of Man is currently focusing on updating its regulatory framework, Solvency II, Brexit and the Asian market all hold big opportunities for the island
Debbie Walker of the North Carolina Department of Insurance tells Becky Butcher why the state is among 2017’s standout performers
Experts convene to talk to Becky Butcher about the stability that Guernsey represents in a challenging financial and political environment
In an era of increasing uncertainty, Tamatoa Jonassen suggests that the Cook Islands can be a bridge to financial security in a captive
With a dedicated captive plan in place, the Lone Star State is on the rise, says Josh Magden of the Texas Captive Insurance Association
After 36 years of captive business, Vermont boasts a culture of legislative change, and still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Dan Towle and David Provost explain