Boss of the stop-loss
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has had the tendency to push a greater number of middle-market companies into self-funding their healthcare programmes and buying medical stop-loss insurance to protect them from catastrophic claims experience. The concept is simple. Rather than using a fully insured plan, the employer sponsors a self-funded health benefit plan and includes medical stop-loss coverage through the commercial insurance market, a captive insurance company, or a combination of the two. Reasons for taking this approach include: reducing overall costs associated with state premium taxes and ACA requirements, providing greater control over the plan design, and taking advantage of a younger and healthier workforce to avoid the adverse selection encountered by the insurance exchanges.

A primary advantage to using a medical stop-loss programme is that the regulatory burden is greatly reduced because these plans are not considered an employee benefit programme under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and so prior approval is not needed from the Department of Labor. This is primarily due to the fact that the policy covers the employer for catastrophic loss experience associated with a self-funded health benefit plan. For this reason, it also cannot be considered a third-party risk.

There are additional benefits when a captive is included in the plan, such as greater tax efficiency, and the ability to minimise the effects of exclusions in the commercial insurer (often referred to as a reinsurer) medical stop-loss coverage, the ability to smooth out claims volatility from year to year and the ability to customise the terms and attachment points at the division level.

Also, greater risk distribution is achieved by adding medical stop-loss to captives that insure other lines of coverage. The use of a captive to insure all or part of a medical stop-loss programme provides significant benefits for the right companies.

The structure of a medical stop-loss programme

The stop-loss coverage can be either specific or aggregate, or a combination of these. Specific stop-loss covers claims in excess of an amount for any covered individual.

Aggregate stop-loss covers the risk that the total of all claims within the policy period exceeds a stop-loss threshold. These two forms of medical stop loss are often purchased together.

The structure of each medical stop-loss programme can take many forms, including:
  • The employer purchases the medical stop-loss coverage from a commercial insurer and self-insures all losses under the stop-loss attachment point.

  • The employer purchases the medical stop-loss coverage from a captive insurer and self-insures all losses under the stop loss attachment point. The captive may be owned by or affiliated with the employer as a single parent captive, exist as part of a captive cell company (generally for smaller employers), or be a group captive.

  • The employer purchases the medical stop-loss coverage from a commercial insurer that cedes a layer to the captive insurer. The employer then self-insures all losses under the stop loss attachment point.

  • There are countless combinations of how the layers can be pieced together based on the individual goals of the employer. The factors to be considered in the planning process consist of having a coordinated team of experts, including a benefits consultant, programme administrator, claims manager, medical stop-loss provider, captive manager, actuaries and experienced legal counsel.

    Considerations in forming the captive

    Employers that want to use a captive to participate in a medical stop-loss programme will also need to analyse the feasibility of forming the captive for that purpose. There are legal, tax and regulatory considerations in addition to the technical risk management issues. The legal structure, ownership and corporate governance need to be seriously addressed.

    Also, multiple layers of tax planning should be addressed, including federal and state income taxes of the employer associated with the deductibility of premium payments, state premium taxes of the captive, and issues involving the definition of insurance from the perspective of the Internal Revenue Service.

    The relative merits of the regulatory environments of the many captive domiciles should also be assessed in relation to the goals of the employer.

    These and other considerations are to be addressed by competent experts as part of the feasibility study. In the case of medical stop-loss, an actuarial study should be the first step to make certain that the employee census and the resulting loss experience can support a medical stop-loss programme and to identify alternative costs associated with different attachment points in light of the employer’s level of risk aversion.

    Once the actuarial analysis is complete, pro forma financial statements covering the next five years should be generated for both the expected scenario and an adverse scenario to assess the surplus requirements and rate adequacy. These pro forma financial statements will then be included in a detailed business plan to guide the formation and implementation of the captive.

    Once the feasibility analysis is complete and the parties agree that the use of a captive insurance company to participate in a medical stop-loss programme is feasible and the preferred option, the captive will be formed in the appropriate domicile, the sponsored plan should be created and the reinsurer identified. The captive will be incorporated and licensed to issue the medical stop-loss policy and any other policies that fit into the overall programme. Finally, the other service providers will be identified and brought into the overall programme.

    Self-funded health benefits plans are not new, and neither is the use of medical stop-loss coverage to protect against catastrophic losses or high aggregate losses.

    These plans have been used by larger employers for many years. However, the ACA changed the rules for these programmes by making fully insured programmes significantly more costly. This in turn has pushed the point where medical stop-loss programmes make sense to smaller middle-market employers.

    The reduced cost of these plans compared to fully insured plans, along with other significant benefits—such as greater control over plan design and the ability to avoid the adverse selection that is causing chaos in the commercial market and the exchanges—creates incentives to form captives and utilise stop-loss policies that did not exist before the passage of the ACA.

    Since many of these middle-market employers currently use captive planning to manage other operational risks, it is a natural tendency to include medical stop-loss coverage in the existing captive, or to form a separate captive for that purpose.

    While some states are hostile to the trend and are exploring ways to increase minimum attachment points in order to squeeze smaller employers out of the market, other states are embracing the concept.

    The formation of a medical stop-loss captive is not a simple project, so great care should be taken to secure knowledgeable strategic partners that will lead you away from the many pitfalls that can arise. However, with the right team, proper planning and a supportive corporate culture, medical stop-loss programmes that include a captive insurance company can provide powerful benefits.
    The latest features from Captive Insurance Times
    Having the ability to stabilise regulatory and fiscal certainty through self-funding will continue to drive expansion of the self-insured and medical stop-loss captive markets, says Phillip Giles of QBE North America
    Attendees of the European Insurance Forum in Dublin heard how insurance and reinsurance professionals are readying for turbulent times ahead
    Join Our Newsletter

    Sign up today and never
    miss the latest news or an issue again

    Subscribe now
    Interest in forming new captives and protected cell companies is on the rise, according to the latest Aon Global Risk Management Survey
    SACs in Bermuda, first crafted in the statute in 2000, are a useful tool for both captive and commercial insurers, says Kim Willey of ASW Law
    Rule-focused decisions have kept captives from delivering full value, say Carrie Lam and Steve Prince of Collins Barrow
    Attendees of this year’s European Insurance Forum can expect a full and comprehensive agenda. Eddy Van Cutsem explains
    Richard Paris-Smith of Willis Towers Watson explains how the UK’s recent changes to the Ogden discount rate will affect captive insurers
    Reputation insurance is an important part of any company’s risk management strategy, according to Dr Nir Kossovsky of Steel City Re
    Domicile profiles
    The latest domicile profiles from Captive Insurance Times
    In an era of increasing uncertainty, Tamatoa Jonassen suggests that the Cook Islands can be a bridge to financial security in a captive
    With a dedicated captive plan in place, the Lone Star State is on the rise, says Josh Magden of the Texas Captive Insurance Association
    Asset Servicing Times

    Visit our sister site
    for all the latest asset servicing news and analysis
    After 36 years of captive business, Vermont boasts a culture of legislative change, and still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Dan Towle and David Provost explain
    After a successful 2016 and the licensing of its first securitisation cell company, Malta insurance industry professionals are looking ahead to 2017
    Missouri’s captive programme is approaching a decade in operation. John Talley explains how the state has made it to this milestone
    Less than 10 years ago, the Bahamas was a virtually forgotten player in the external insurance marketplace, according to Tanya McCartney and Michele Fields. But today, the jurisdiction has a reputation as a market leader
    As the new head of insurance supervision in Cayman, Ruwan Jayasekera reveals how he will strive to meet international best practices and standards while encouraging innovation in the domicile
    Danielle Hermansen of PKF Malta discusses how Malta can and is fully utilising its potential in the insurance industry
    The latest interviews from Captive Insurance Times