What is new for the Bahamas in terms of regulations, and is there anything on the horizon?

There have not been any recent changes in regulations with regard to captive insurance. Since its inception five years ago, the Insurance Commission of the Bahamas (ICB) has focused on developing a robust regulatory and supervisory regime, which is compliant with international best practices. We will continue to monitor emerging issues and best practices that might require new regulations or guidelines.

How supportive is the KB to captives in particular?

The insurance commission is very supportive of captive business. We have human resources dedicated to processing captive applications and ongoing captive supervision.

We remain current with international standards and best practices with respect to captive insurance sector supervision. Our staff attend international captive conferences to enable them to keep abreast of the developments and innovation in captive and alternative risks management solutions.

The commission also co-sponsors and participates in local conferences and information seminars with the Bahamas Financial Services Board and the Institute of Insurance of the Bahamas. Together with these partners, we offer scholarships for captive designations and education to local financial services sector industry participants.

What has changed for the domicile’s captive industry in the three years since you took the position?

The number of captives in the Bahamas has grown exponentially in the last few years, particularly in the area of cell captives. The ICB has licensed medium and small captives including investor and association captives.

With that growth, the experience of the supervisors at the ICB has been enriched and their knowledge base has been enhanced. Further, with the growth in business, more expertise is being developed among the service providers.

Has the captive industry been helped by the success of other financial services in the Bahamas?

The Bahamas is seeking ways to leverage the expertise in wealth management, trust and banking to further develop as a domicile for external insurance companies. We are seeing the expansion of synergies between the traditional financial services and the captive concept by individuals and organisations, both local and offshore.

Do you think, in terms of regulations, that the gap between offshore and onshore is closing?

As we move to risk based supervision it is less about offshore versus onshore, but more about the adequacy of the risk management and operational practices of the captive. While there are a few dynamics that perhaps play a role in the offshore and on-shore concept such as tax and exchange control policies, essentially all captives are insurance or alternative risk transfer vehicles that vary in nature, size, and complexity.

Is tax still a big factor in attracting business to the Bahamas?

There are no premium of corporate taxes levied on captive insurance companies licensed under the External Insurance Act. However, it is the complete package of features that the Bahamas boasts, which makes it attractive to external investors in general and captive mangers in particular. These include the expertise of the service providers throughout the financial sector including insurance, the well regulated and supervised financial sector, the professional culture and ease of doing business, the convenience of location, the lifestyle amenities and the reputation of the domicile.

How much has the impending Solvency II in Europe affected regulation in the Bahamas?

There have not been any recent changes in regulations with regard to captive insurance. Currently, the commission is not seeking Solvency II equivalency for its solvency and prudential regime—though this might be considered should there be a surge in business emanating from Europe. Our risk-based supervisory approach takes into account the size, nature and complexity of the insurer.

How profitable is the arrangement 831(b) for the domicile? Does still it bring in new business?

We are aware that many of our cell captives qualify for the 831(b) tax election. These and other captives have provided spin off income to local service providers such as resident representatives, lawyers, accountants and other related professionals.
Domicile profiles
The latest domicile profiles from Captive Insurance Times
Tennessee’s governor, commissioner, general assembly and business community have all worked together to create ‘explosive growth’ in the state’s captive insurance industry. Julie Mix McPeak explains more
Newly-appointed chairman of CCIA Michael Maglaras suggests that the future is bright for state’s captive industry
Asset Servicing Times

Visit our sister site
for all the latest asset servicing news and analysis
Although the Isle of Man is currently focusing on updating its regulatory framework, Solvency II, Brexit and the Asian market all hold big opportunities for the island
Debbie Walker of the North Carolina Department of Insurance tells Becky Butcher why the state is among 2017’s standout performers
Experts convene to talk to Becky Butcher about the stability that Guernsey represents in a challenging financial and political environment
In an era of increasing uncertainty, Tamatoa Jonassen suggests that the Cook Islands can be a bridge to financial security in a captive
With a dedicated captive plan in place, the Lone Star State is on the rise, says Josh Magden of the Texas Captive Insurance Association
After 36 years of captive business, Vermont boasts a culture of legislative change, and still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Dan Towle and David Provost explain
The latest features from Captive Insurance Times
Jeremy Colombik of MSI and NCCIA chair explains to Becky Butcher that Notice 2016-66 could be detrimental to not just North Carolina, but other domiciles that are home to smaller captives
Dan Towle, president of CICA and Zach Finn, professor at Butler University, discuss their new professional development partnership, which will see students learn about the variety of career opportunities in captive insurance
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Alan Cabello of AGCS discusses blockchain technology, captives and the future
Alan Fine of Brown Smith Wallace explains how the industry should proceed after the Avrahami court case ruling
Dana Hentges Sheridan, general counsel and chief compliance officer at Active Captive Management, provides insight into the differences between business risks and insurance risks
Predicting when interest rates will change is difficult, which is even more reason to maintain a disciplined approach to your investments, according to Stephen Nedwicki of Comerica Bank
Looking ahead to 2018, Phillip Giles of QBE North America predicts continued uncertainty for the healthcare reform
Michael Schroeder of Roundstone explains why transparency, control and cost savings are the secret sauce offered by a medical captive
The latest interviews from Captive Insurance Times