Officials at Montana’s insurance department are confident that this year will be a continuation of the Treasure State’s push to solidify its position as a go-to captive domicile.

Having licensed its first captive in 2002, the state is now on course to license its 200th within the next 12 months, following a 2014 that saw it add 34 new formations to its roster.

Although Montana did lose seven captives last year, its net gain of 27 entities demonstrates that it’s undergoing a period of growth at a time when domicile competition is increasing in the US. In 2013, Montana secured 47 new captives, bringing its then total to 150. The state lost 11 entities that year, so 2014 was a little slower, admits Steve Matthews, director of captives in the Office of the Commissioner of Securities and Insurance.

“I think we are going to be the same as what happens in the rest of the country. I’m expecting us to do what we’ve done the last few years. We’ve got the expertise and the infrastructure here that make us an attractive domicile for plenty of companies out there.”

Putting forward’s Montana’s pitch for new business, Matthews explains: “We cater broadly, we’re open to any type of captive. We are looking for captives that make business sense and meet our regulatory requirements.”

“We have a couple of captive management firms here in the state that do great work and we really want to see them grow and continue to prosper. We also have several law firms in the state that do a lot of captive work for captive clients. Our in-state infrastructure is growing and getting more excited about the business, but we also allow some out-of-state captive managers, too.”

Regulatory tweaks

Among the legislative changes made last year was Montana’s adoption of a series LLC (limited liability company) capability for protected cells. In essence, the LLC capability is another level of protection for a cell within a protected cell captive, allowing cells to erect partitions between each other’s liabilities. Montana’s decision to allow series LLC captives makes it only the second to do so in the US, with Delaware being the first domicile to adopt the capability.

Matthews says: “2014 was our first full year with the series LLC capability. The aim of its introduction was to keep up with the other states and be on the cutting edge and allow captives to take advantage of that. All that has to happen is a captive, the captive manager and their attorney decide that the series LLC is the vehicle they want to use and they have to fill out the appropriate form. So far they seem to be working fine.”

Montana’s legislature is currently considering multiple captive insurance bills. One in particular aims to make business fairer in the Treasure State.

It will allow for a pro-rata distribution of taxes within the year of a captive’s closure, so as to make leaving the domicile less punitive. Matthews explains: “We have a minimum premium tax and we have prorated that on the year of formation of the captive. What we didn’t have was a way of adjusting the minimum premium tax when a captive closes. At the moment, even if a captive dissolves at the beginning of the year, it pays the same tax as a captive that closes right at the end of the year.”

Under Montana’s current captive laws, the minimum premium tax was also set higher, with it having to be prorated on a quarterly basis beginning at $5,000 in Q1, $3,750 in Q2, $2,500 in Q3 and $1,250 in Q4.

The new bill would amend Montana’s legislation to add a whole new section on minimum premium taxes for the year in which the captive dissolves, with thresholds set at $1,250 in Q1, $2,500 in Q2, $3,750 in Q3 and $5,000 in Q4.

Matthews says: “With this new bill, we will be able to use a pro-rata distribution for the minimum premium tax when the captive dissolves. If they dissolve in the month of January, they pay considerably less tax, which is always the fairer way to do it.”
Domicile profiles
The latest domicile profiles from Captive Insurance Times
Tennessee’s governor, commissioner, general assembly and business community have all worked together to create ‘explosive growth’ in the state’s captive insurance industry. Julie Mix McPeak explains more
Newly-appointed chairman of CCIA Michael Maglaras suggests that the future is bright for state’s captive industry
Asset Servicing Times

Visit our sister site
for all the latest asset servicing news and analysis
Although the Isle of Man is currently focusing on updating its regulatory framework, Solvency II, Brexit and the Asian market all hold big opportunities for the island
Debbie Walker of the North Carolina Department of Insurance tells Becky Butcher why the state is among 2017’s standout performers
Experts convene to talk to Becky Butcher about the stability that Guernsey represents in a challenging financial and political environment
In an era of increasing uncertainty, Tamatoa Jonassen suggests that the Cook Islands can be a bridge to financial security in a captive
With a dedicated captive plan in place, the Lone Star State is on the rise, says Josh Magden of the Texas Captive Insurance Association
After 36 years of captive business, Vermont boasts a culture of legislative change, and still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Dan Towle and David Provost explain
The latest features from Captive Insurance Times
Jeremy Colombik of MSI and NCCIA chair explains to Becky Butcher that Notice 2016-66 could be detrimental to not just North Carolina, but other domiciles that are home to smaller captives
Alan Fine of Brown Smith Wallace explains how the industry should proceed after the Avrahami court case ruling
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Dana Hentges Sheridan, general counsel and chief compliance officer at Active Captive Management, provides insight into the differences between business risks and insurance risks
Predicting when interest rates will change is difficult, which is even more reason to maintain a disciplined approach to your investments, according to Stephen Nedwicki of Comerica Bank
Looking ahead to 2018, Phillip Giles of QBE North America predicts continued uncertainty for the healthcare reform
Michael Schroeder of Roundstone explains why transparency, control and cost savings are the secret sauce offered by a medical captive
Attendees of the Guernsey Insurance Forum heard how important it is for different parts of the industry to work together not only to co-exist, but also to collaborate
Captives must demonstrate they are both efficient and cost effective. Colin Freeman and Peter Downey explain what Barclays can do to help
The latest interviews from Captive Insurance Times