Washington DC
09 June 2017
Reporter: Mark Dugdale

Financial CHOICE Act passes House


The Financial CHOICE Act, the legislation that proposes to repeal and replace the Dodd-Frank Act, has passed the House of Representatives.

The bill passed the House of Representatives yesterday with 233 votes to 186. Its journey through the Senate, however, is expected to be much more difficult, with Democrats keen to curtail any attempts to soften regulation of financial services.

The Financial CHOICE Act promises to radically re-write several key aspects of Dodd-Frank, and scrap the rest, including the Federal Insurance Office (FIO).

Dodd-Frank mandated the FIO to monitor the insurance industry, assist in administering the terrorism risk insurance programme, and coordinate federal involvement and policy making on international insurance matters and negotiations.

But Republicans believe its responsibilities should be given to a new insurance advocate with the power to vote in the Financial Stability Oversight Council, an inter-agency group of federal and state regulators and other financial regulatory experts charged with identifying risks to financial stability under Dodd-Frank.

There are also question marks over the future of Dodd-Frank’s Non-admitted and Reinsurance Reform Act, which the captive insurance industry has long sought to clarify.

Under the Non-admitted and Reinsurance Reform Act, it’s unclear whether independent procurement taxes on the insurance purchased from a captive must be paid to the insured’s home state in addition to the captive domicile.

Various regulatory initiatives have failed to obtain this clarification in recent years. If the Financial CHOICE Act did do away with the Non-admitted and Reinsurance Reform Act, individual state statutes on independent procurement taxes would still be in play.

As one expert commented: “This has been a thorn in the sides of captives with self-procurement tax in various states. While repealing this portion of Dodd-Frank won’t do away with each state’s self-procurement tax statutes, it will take the federal government out of the equation, which is always helpful.”

More regulation news
The latest news from Captive Insurance Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
UK’s ILS legislation to be in place for January renewals
17 October 2017 | London | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
Malcolm Newman, CEO of Scor’s London hub and sponsor of the London Market Group’s (LMG) ILS Taskforce is “cognisant of the time pressures if ILS applications are to be made in time for 1 January renewals”
Tennessee updates captive legislation
03 October 2017 | Nashville | Reporter: Becky Butcher
New captive legislation is to set Tennessee apart from other US captive insurance domiciles, according to the state’s Department of Commerce and Insurance (TDCI).
US and EU sign covered agreement
22 September 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Becky Butcher
The US and EU have signed the bilateral covered agreement on insurance and reinsurance
GFSC addresses Solvency II and IAIS capital standards project
20 September 2017 | St Peter Port | Reporter: Becky Butcher
The Guernsey Financial Services Commission (GFSC) has launched a discussion paper seeking the industry’s feedback on the evolution of the island’s global and European insurance capital standards
DARAG completes Ikano captive transaction
08 September 2017 | Jerusalem | Reporter: Katherine Brown
DARAG has completed an Israeli reinsurance transaction and received regulatory approval for the acquisition of Ikano Försäkring, the Stockholm-based Swedish captive owned by Ikano Group
Avrahami might not have all the answers, says Feldman
29 August 2017 | Houston | Reporter: Becky Butcher
The US Tax Court’s ruling in Avrahami might not be the victory for the IRS that everyone thinks it is, according to Stewart Feldman, CEO and general counsel of Capstone Associated Services
Avrahami provides clarity for 831(b)s
25 August 2017 | Burlington | Reporter: Becky Butcher
The ruling of the Avrahami vs Commissioner of Internal Revenue court case finally provides additional clarity for captives organised under Section 831(b), according to Anne Marie Towle of JLT